Subsequently, using array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), Keats et al.  elegantly demonstrated the presence of multiple clones in a patient with IgA MM. The impact of these multiple clones is illustrated in the clinical case history below. Further evidence for clonal heterogeneity of MM tumours was demonstrated by Lohr et al.  who conducted a next generation sequencing study of plasma cell populations from 203 patients with newly diagnosed MM. The authors concluded that most MM patients have at least three minor subclonal populations in addition to the dominant tumour clone. This means that whilst most tumour plasma cells share a common pool of mutations, subclones are present that differ from one another by several mutations .
The effectiveness of current anti-myeloma therapies on different clonal populations has been investigated by Campbell and colleagues . The study evaluated 44 patients with biclonal MM enrolled in a series of phase III clinical trials (Myeloma IX, Myeloma XI, and TEAMM). In 32% (14/44) of patients, the monoclonal proteins corresponding to the dominant and minor clones exhibited a similar response to therapy. However, in 43% (19/44) of cases, the response of the dominant tumour clone was greater. For example, a very good partial response or higher was achieved for 61% (27/44) dominant clones but only 45% (20/44) minor clones (p=0.002). Therefore, anti-myeloma therapies may exert a differential effect against dominant and minor tumour cell clones, this is illustrated in the clinical case history below.
Campbell et al.  also monitored 31 biclonal MM patients in disease remission. Whilst monoclonal protein concentrations corresponding to the minor clone were initially stable in the majority (90%) of cases, 50% of patients had a relapse of their dominant clone. The authors suggest that response of minor clones to anti-myeloma therapy is of greater duration while that of major clones is of greater depth.