SECTION 2 - Free light chains and monoclonal gammopathies

From Wikilite

Share/Save/Bookmark
Jump to: navigation, search

SECTION 2 - Free light chains and monoclonal gammopathies

Section 2A. (Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14). Multiple Myeloma.
Section 2B. (Chapters 15, 16, and 17). Diseases with monoclonal light chain deposition.
Section 2C. (Chapters 18 and 19). Other diseases with monoclonal free light chains.

Pie chart showing proportion of individuals with MGUS (51%), multiple myeloma (18%), AL amyloidosis (11%), Smouldering multiple myeloma (6%) and other monoclonal gammopathies diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic during 2005
Fig 7.0 Monoclonal gammopathies diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic during 2005.

The main clinical applications of serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements are for patients with monoclonal gammopathies (Chapter 29). Figure 7.0 shows the associated diseases seen at the Mayo Clinic in 2005 [1]. These data are from a specialist referral centre; general hospitals see different patterns of disease referral with a higher percentage of MM and MGUS and fewer AL amyloidosis patients.

Table 7.0 shows the approximate annual incidence of the more common monoclonal gammopathies reported in the USA. Over the past 10 years, there have been publications covering many aspects of FLC usage in light chain multiple myeloma (LCMM), nonsecretory multiple myeloma (NSMM) and AL amyloidosis while its benefits in MGUS are now well established. Other clinical applications have recently been described including in solitary plasmacytomas, smouldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma (SMM), Waldenström’s macroglobulinaemia (WM) and B-CLL all of which are described in their respective chapters.

Dispenzieri et al. [2] recently suggested that these observations on sFLCs represent an important step in understanding monoclonal gammopathies and add to previous definitions. 1st, there was the separation of polyclonal and monoclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. 2nd, there was the realization that premalignant MGUS existed. 3rd, the concept of SMM became an accepted principle. 4th, there was an international consensus on the definitions for the spectrum of MGUS to SMM to active MM. Each of these benchmark decisions were based upon observational studies that incorporated the following four variables to reach conclusions and recommendations:

1. Monoclonal protein; 2. Bone marrow plasmacytosis; 3. Symptom status; 4. Time.

They proposed that sFLC κ/λ ratios should be introduced as another variable that may better define these clinical entities. It is a simple test that provides information about underlying plasma cell biology and baseline sFLC κ/λ ratios provide valuable prognostic information. Furthermore, all recent studies indicate that in the spectrum of disease development from MGUS, through ASMM to symptomatic MM, increasing monoclonal FLC production becomes progressively more probable. This accumulating evidence has led to new international guidelines (Chapter 25) where sFLC analysis is recommended in patient diagnosis and prognosis, as well as the management of a number of the individual conditions [3].

The following chapters review these studies and suggest investigations that may be of clinical value in the future. In addition, there are many other studies showing the importance of sFLCs when screening for monoclonal diseases, replacement of urine testing, their role in patient monitoring, etc. (Section 4). There is even the probability of reversing myeloma kidney damage with the combination of novel “high cut-off” haemodialysis and chemotherapy (Chapter 13).


Annual
incidence
*Monoclonal
proteins
sFLC
abnormal
Median
survival
**Utility of
sFLC
IIMM 15,500 100% 96% 3-4 years Important
LCMM 3,200 100% 100% 3-4 years Important
NSMM 650 0% >70% 3-4 years Important
Plasmacytoma 1,000 50% ~80% >10 years Important
AL Amyloidosis 2,500 75-90% >95% 1-2 years Important
LCDD 100 90% 90% 3-4 years Important
Waldenström’s 1,000 100% 97% 5 years Interesting
MGUS 1,000,000 100% 30-60% >12 years Important
SMM 250 100% ~90% 5-10 years Important
#B-CLL 10,000 ~50% ~35% ~5 years Interesting

Table 7.0. Incidence of diseases producing monoclonal proteins in the USA [4]. *% showing monoclonal proteins by traditional electrophoretic methods. ** Based on current publications. #Other B-cell lymphoid malignancies also produce monoclonal immunoglobulins. IIMM: intact immunoglobulin multiple myeloma, LCDD: light chain deposition disease, B-CLL: B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Chapter 6 Back to Contents Page Chapter 7

References

  1. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Br J Haematol 2006;134:573-89 PMID: 16938117
  2. Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, Therneau TM, Larson D, Benson J, et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood 2008;111:785–9 PMID: 17942755
  3. Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, Miguel JS, Ludwig H, Hajek R et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia 2009;23:215-24 PMID: 19020545
  4. Melpas JS, Bergsagel DE, Kyle RA, Anderson KC. Myeloma: Biology and management: Sanders, Elsevier Inc, USA, 2004
Personal tools