Renal diseases and free light chains
From Wikilite
|
20 |
SECTION 3 - Diseases with increased polyclonal free light chains |
| Renal diseases and free light chains |
| Summary: In patients with renal impairment: |
|---|
|
20.1. Introduction
Elevated polyclonal FLCs in serum (associated with normal κ/λ ratios) result from increased polyclonal production, reduced renal clearance or a combination of both mechanisms. Increased production is due to proliferation of plasma cells and/or their progenitors and is frequently associated with polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia. This is a common finding in patients with liver diseases, connective tissue disorders, chronic infections, etc. A complete list of the relevant diseases is given in Chapter 29.
Reduced clearance of sFLCs results from impaired renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and is a frequent finding. This can be seen even in apparently healthy, elderly individuals who may have normal serum creatinine concentrations but elevated polyclonal sFLCs from slight reduction in GFR.
Frequently, acute and chronic inflammatory diseases are associated with some degree of renal impairment. The combination of increased production and reduced renal clearance leads to particularly high sFLC concentrations, classically observed in patients with SLE. Although not documented, it is likely that most patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and associated renal impairment have high concentrations of polyclonal sFLCs, but with substantially normal κ/λ ratios.
20.2. Effect of renal impairment on sFLC concentrations
The normally rapid renal clearance of sFLCs of 2-6 hours is increased to 2-3 days in complete renal failure (Chapter 3) [1]. Removal from the circulation then occurs through pinocytosis in all tissues but particularly by capillary endothelial cells (Chapter 10 and 32). As GFR falls, sFLC concentrations rise and may be 20-30 times normal in end-stage renal failure (Figures 20.1 and 20.2) [2][3][4].
The relationship between sFLC concentrations and GFR is shown in Table 20.1. The MDRD index (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) of GFR produces a worse correlation with FLC levels than serum creatinine levels but better than the Cockroft- Gault formula [5][6]. Cystatin C concentrations have the highest correlation with FLCconcentrations and arguably are the most accurate simple measure of GFR. The rising concentrations of sFLC with progressive CKD stage (from MDRD) is shown in Figure 20.2.
| Kappa | Lambda | |
|---|---|---|
| Serum creatinine | 0.697 | 0.701 |
| Cockroft-Gault formula | 0.521 | 0.490 |
| MDRD | 0.631 | 0.613 |
| Cystatin C | 0.778 | 0.727 |
Table 20.1. Relationship (correlation coefficient - R2) between serum FLC concentrations and different markers of glomerular filtration rate in 107 patients with chronic renal failure. MDRD: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease.
20.3. Effect of renal impairment on serum κ/λ ratios
As both serum κ and λ FLC concentrations increase with deteriorating renal function their relative amounts change slightly. While glomeruli clear monomeric κ molecules approximately 3 times faster than dimeric λ molecules (Chapter 3), pinocytosis removes both proteins at the same rate. With deteriorating renal function κ/λ ratios gradually increase and eventually equal the κ:λ production rates of approximately 1.8:1 in endstage renal failure [2][3][4][7].
The effect of renal impairment on κ/λ ratios is seen in several patient groups:-
- 1. κ and λ concentrations increase with age in apparently normal individuals because of minor degrees of renal impairment (Figure 5.1). This is associated with an increase in the median κ/λ ratio from 0.49 to 0.70 in older people (Table 5.3) . This is shown as a deviation in the κ/λ ratios from 0.6 on a κ/λ plot (Figure 5.2) .
- 2. Patients in chronic renal failure, but without FLC monoclonal gammopathies, have higher κ/λ ratios than normal individuals .
- 3. Patients with AL amyloidosis caused by λ FLC monoclonal gammopathies tend to have κ/λ ratios closer to the normal range population than κ-producing patients (Figure 20.4). There is also asymmetry of κ compared with λ FLC concentrations in patients with LCMM (Figure 8.2) and MGUS (Figure 19.4). The patients with these diseases frequently have some degree of renal failure so that κ concentrations are relatively high. Individuals with normal renal function clear κ molecules more quickly.
The change in κ/λ ratios with increasing renal impairment is of clinical relevance when interpreting borderline results. Patients might be misclassified as having minor κ monoclonal gammopathies because of slightly increased κ/λ ratios when, in fact, they have renal impairment. Equally, patients with minor λ monoclonal gammopathies could have normal κ/λ ratios because of the relative increase in κ concentrations (Figure 20.4: A to B). A higher cut-off should be used when assessing patients with acute renal failure (Figure 13.5).
20.4. Removal of free light chains by dialysis in chronic renal failure
The pore size of haemodialysis membranes (dialysers) allows removal of small to medium-sized protein molecules from the blood. Membranes typically have a molecular weight cut-off of 10-15kDa so the filtration efficiency for FLCs is very low. However, some dialysers are more permeable and others adsorb FLCs on to their surfaces. Figure 20.5 shows the reduction in serum FLC concentrations in 40 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) over a 4-hour dialysis period using high-flux polysulphonate membranes. 60% of κ and 37% of dimeric λ molecules were removed and median κ/λ ratios changed from 1.23 to 0.7.
The quantities of FLCs in the filtrate fluid accounted for approximately 60% of the observed reductions in serum concentrations while the remainder was adsorbed onto the filtration membranes [8]. Multiple sampling of the dialysate fluid from a patient during the 4-hour haemodialysis period showed slowly reducing FLC concentrations as serum levels fell (Figure 20.6). Dialysate fluid κ/λ ratios changed from 1.6 to 1.4 during the dialysis period as greater amounts of the smaller monomeric κ molecules were preferentially cleared. Some dialysers are more efficient at FLC removal because of larger pore sizes and different suface charges. However, the amounts present in CRF are hundreds of times lower than those found in LCMM. In the latter patients “high cut-off” dialysers must be used for effective FLC removal (Chapter 13). Whether such large pore dialysers are clinically useful in preventing dialysis associated diseases in CRF is currently being assessed.
Peritoneal dialysis may be less efficient at removing FLCs (Figure 20.1). The fluid volumes exchanged during this process are much less than in haemodialysis, which presumably accounts for the poor removal.
The clinical consequences of elevated sFLCs in renal impairment are unclear. Reports have suggested that the elevated FLCs lead to reductions in immune function and should therefore be classified as uraemic toxins [9]. Indeed, studies have shown that FLCs are inflammatory proteins [10]. It is thought that their toxicity may partly account for the relatively poor survival of many patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis.
There is an additional concern about the toxicity of the high FLC load on the kidneys in patients during the progression to end-stage renal failure. As the nephron mass declines with increasing renal impairment the remaining nephrons, which are hyperfiltrating, are exposed to increasing levels of potentially toxic FLCs. This may contribute to an accelerating decline in renal function [11].
20.5. Monoclonal free light chains in chronic renal failure
It is of interest that 8 of 107 (7%) patients in chronic renal failure in Figure 20.1 and Table 20.3 had monoclonal gammopathies. None were associated with clinically apparent plasma cell dyscrasias and, indeed, only one had been identified prior to the study. 3 of the patients had FLC-only MGUS. 5 other patients had intact immunoglobulin monoclonal proteins identified by serum IFE of which 2 had associated abnormal FLC ratios.
Hutchison et al. [12][2], assessed the prevalence of MGUS in patients with CKD and renal transplant recipients using sFLC analysis and IFE for intact monoclonal immunoglobulins. Of 595 patients studied in the CKD group, 10.6% had MGUS which was 3 times higher than an aged matched population (Figure 20.7). In the transplant patients, 8.3% had MGUS (Figure 20.8).
The reason for the high MGUS prevalence is unclear. However, monoclonal FLCs may contribute to an increased rate of renal deterioration in patients with or without underlying renal damage. Dingli et al. [13], showed that there was a relationship between focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and plasma cell disorders in a study of 13 patients. It was considered likely that some of the pathological damage was due to monoclonal FLCs. Studies of renal biopsies in patients with chronic renal disease have shown that AL amyloidosis is under recognised and approximately 3% of biopsies have monoclonal light chains deposited in renal tissues without systemic features [14][15].
Many of these patients with light chain monoclonal diseases require chemotherapy, but monitoring treatment from repeated biopsies is impractical. Serum FLC analysis should allow these patients to be identifed early and monitored for the appropriate chemotherapy in order to eliminate their clonal disease [16]. It may be that these patients with renal failure should not be transplanted until their clonal plasma cell disorder is properly treated as the donated kidney may not survive long [17][18].
As regards monoclonal FLCs in the renal transplant recipients, MGUS may result from the effects of immunomodulatory drugs. The time course of MGUS development and its clinical and pathological consequences are unknown. Further studies are needed.
| Patient | Kappa | Lambda | κ/λ ratio | IFE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.42 | 671.77 | 0.04 | Normal |
| 2 | 19.1 | 246.77 | 0.08 | Normal |
| 3 | 19.88 | 118.13 | 0.17 | IgGλ |
| 4 | 25.15 | 40.31 | 0.62 | IgGκ |
| 5 | 33.06 | 46.58 | 0.71 | IgGλ |
| 6 | 31.52 | 39.41 | 0.80 | IgGκ |
| 7 | 141.32 | 53.15 | 2.66 | IgGκ |
| 8 | 216.91 | 81.31 | 2.67 | Normal |
Table 20.3. Analysis of 8 samples with monoclonal gammopathies (5 with monoclonal light chains only) in 107 patients with chronic renal failure (from Figure 20.1).
Clinical Case History No 10
| Clinical case history No 10. Influence of renal function on sFLC concentrations. | |
|---|---|
|
A 55-year-old woman presented with uncomplicated IgGκ ΜΜ and was given three courses of VAD followed by high dose melphalan and a PBSCT. She was well immediately following the transplant but then developed a degree of renal impairment. Careful attendance to fluid and electrolyte balance restored normal renal function. While in hospital, she was monitored daily with sFLCs in an on-going investigation into their role as markers of treatment responsiveness (Figure 20.9 and Chapter 13). The effect of high dose melphalan was to reduce both κ and λ FLCs to below normal concentrations with a favourable relative reduction in the tumour FLC levels. Subsequently, from day 15, as bone marrow engraftment took place, both FLCs increased and the κ/λ ratio normalised. Then, the FLCs increased above normal with a rising κ/λ ratio indicating some renal impairment. This observation was supported by an increase in serum creatinine concentrations. After day 22, FLC concentrations normalised and the κ/λ ratio fell, alongside serum creatinine levels. In this patient, the combination of serial sFLC concentrations and serum creatinine measurements allowed assessment of renal dysfunction and bone marrow recovery. Changes in the κ/λ ratio may need to be corrected for renal impairment if there is confusion about interpreting the results. In addition, since patients with plasma cell dyscrasias are frequently elderly and are treated with nephrotoxic drugs, repeated measurements of sFLCs might assist in assessing renal function. | |
|
Figure 20.9. Changes in FLCs and creatinine while monitoring a patient with MM after high-dose melphalan and PBSCT (Courtesy of G Pratt). | |
| Test Questions |
|---|
|
| Answers |
|---|
|
| Chapter 19 | Back to Contents Page | Chapter 21 |
References
- ↑ Abraham GN, Waterhouse C. Evidence for defective immunoglobulin metabolism in severe renal insufficiency. Am J Med Sci 1974; 268: 227 – 33 PMID: 4217565
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Hutchison CA, Mead G, Chandler K, Harper J, Bradwell AR, Cockwell P. Free light chain abnormalities in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: PUB393a
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Hutchison CA, Harding S, Hewins P, Mead GP, Townsend J, Bradwell AR, Cockwell P. Quantitative assessment of serum and urinary polyclonal free light chains in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 1684 – 90 PMID: 18945993
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Scherberich J, Hammer F, Rolinski B. Impact of chronic renal failure and hameodialysis on serum free polyclonal immunoglobulin kapp/lambda light-chains. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006; 21: SP021a
- ↑ Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 461 – 70 PMID: 10075613
- ↑ Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16: 31 – 41 PMID: 1244564
- ↑ Wells JM, van Hoeven KH, Abadie JM. Serum free light chains assays in clinical practice: Impact of impaired renal function on interpretation. Clin Chem 2008; 54: C91a
- ↑ Cohen G, Rudnicki M, Schmaldienst S, Horl WH. Effect of dialysis on serum/plasma levels of free immunoglobulin light chains in end-stage renal disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 879 – 83 PMID: 11981077
- ↑ Cohen G, Rudnicki M, Horl WH. Uraemic toxins modulate the spontaneous apoptotic cell death and essential function of neutrophils. Kidney Int 2001; 59: S48 – S52
- ↑ Van der Heijden M, Kraneveld A, Redegeld F. Free immunoglobulin light chains as target in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. Eur J Pharmacol 2006; 533: 319 – 26 PMID: 16455071
- ↑ Kriz W, LeHir M. Pathways to nephron loss starting from glomerular diseases-insights from animal models. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 404 – 19 PMID: 15673288
- ↑ Hutchison CA, Harding S, Basnayake K, Townsend J, Landray M, Mead GP, et al. Increased MGUS prevelance in chronic kidney disease patients. Haematologica 2007; 92: PO905a
- ↑ Dingli D, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Grande JP, Kyle RA. Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis and plasma cell proliferative disorders. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46: 278 – 82 PMID: 16112046
- ↑ Sanders PW, Herrera GA, Kirk KA, Old CW, Galla JH. Spectrum of glomerular and tubulointerstitial renal lesions associated with monotypical immunoglobulin light chain deposition. Lab Invest 1991; 64: 527 – 37 PMID: 1901926
- ↑ Novak L, Cook WJ, Herrera GA, Sanders PW. AL-amyloidosis is underdiagnosed in renal biopsies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 3050 – 3 PMID: 15507480
- ↑ Montseny JJ, Kleinknecht D, Meyrier A, Vanhille P, Simon P, Pruna A, Eladari D. Long-term outcome according to renal histological lesions in 118 patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 1438 – 45 PMID: 9641173
- ↑ Leung N, Lager DJ, Gertz MA, Wilson K, Kanakiriya S, Fervenza FC. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation in light-chain deposition disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 147 – 53 PMID: 14712438
- ↑ Tanenbaum ND, Howell DN, Middleton JP, Spurney RF. Lambda light chain deposition disease in a renal allograft. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 4289 – 92 PMID: 16387099
