Nonsecretory multiple myeloma (NSMM)

From Wikilite

Jump to: navigation, search
Chapter

9

SECTION 2A - Multiple Myeloma

Nonsecretory multiple myeloma (NSMM)

Contents

Summary: In patients with NSMM, serumFLC measurements:-
  1. Are important for diagnosis.
  2. Identify relapses and responses to treatment earlier than other tests.
  3. Allow monitoring without the need for repeated bone marrow biopsies or radiological scans.
  4. Allow patients to be included in clinical trials from which they were previously excluded.

9.1. Introduction

Nonsecretory multiple myeloma (NSMM) accounts for 1-5% of all MM patients. The disease is characterised by the absence of monoclonal immunoglobulins in serum and urine using electrophoretic tests [1][2][3]. Nevertheless, monoclonal proteins can usually be demonstrated in the bone marrow plasma cells by immunohistochemical staining. Using high sensitivity tests such as isoelectric focusing, monoclonal proteins have been detected in the sera of some patients [4]. Other patients have tumour cells that produce but do not secrete monoclonal immunoglobulins into the blood. Finally, 10-15% of NSMM patients are true “non-producers” [5]. In these patients the tumour plasma cells contain no detectable immunoglobulins. As tests for monoclonal proteins have become more sensitive, fewer patients are now classified as NSMM. Yet, even in expert hands, 2-3% of patients with MM have undetectable serum or urine monoclonal immunoglobulins by IFE [2][6][7][8].

From a logical standpoint, such patients cannot be producing significant amounts of intact monoclonal immunoglobulins. IgG molecules accumulate in serum with a half-life of 3-4 weeks so production from even small clones of plasma cells is visible as monoclonal bands on SPE gels. In contrast, FLCs have a serum half-life of only 2-6 hours, 100-200 fold less. Clonal production of monoclonal FLCs, therefore, needs to be correspondingly that much greater to produce similar serum levels to those found in IgG producing MM. Hence, more sensitive techniques are required to detect FLC producing clones when they are small or when production is inefficient.

Investigations on urine samples may also be unhelpful because patients with NSMM usually have normal renal function. The modest increases in monoclonal FLC production, typically seen, may not be sufficient to damage or overwhelm the reabsorption capacity of the kidneys and enter the urine (Chapter 3).

Classification based on
serum free light chains
Free κ
(mg/L)
Free λ
(mg/L)
κ/λ ratio Bone marrow
plasma cells
%
Other FLC
Results
Normal sera ranges   3.6-16 8-33 0.36-1    
12 elevated free κ
and increased
κ/λ ratio
1 1754 1.6 1096 85 IFE κ +/-
2 1201 3.6 333 82 BJP κ +/-
3 935 11 85 70 ND
4 487 6.6 74 20 ND
5 931 13.2 71 >90 IFE κ +/-
6 730 11.1 65 35 ND
7 978 19.4 50 65 ND
8 920 26.3 35 14* ND
9 789 25.6 31 >50 BJP κ +/-
10 480 23.8 20 30 ND
11 151 11.5 13 66 Hist κ+ve
12 79.8 30.8 2.6 50 ND
7 elevated free λ
with reduced κ/λ
ratio
13 11.2 196 0.057 20 IFE λ+
14 2.7 50.9 0.053 74 ND
15 2.6 61 0.043 6* ND
16 17.8 624 0.029 8 IFEλ, BJP+/-
17 3.8 144 0.026 70 ND
18 7.7 389 0.019 60 ND
19 2.8 481 0.005 29 IFE λ+
4 suppression of
either κ, λ or both
free light chains
20 4.5 6 0.75 21 ND
21 1.2 1.6 0.75 55 ND
22 2.4 8.1 0.296 34 ND
23 3.6 13.1 0.274 70 ND
5 κ or λ normal or
elevated and κ/λ
ratios normal or
borderline
24 16.2 23.4 0.692 67 ND
25 20.7 33 0.627 73 ND
26 77 142 0.543 18 IFE λ+
27 8.3 17.4 0.477 9* ND
28 8.6 25.2 0.341 80 ND

Table 9.1. sFLC concentrations in 28 patients with NSMM [1]. Hist: immunohistochemical confirmation of MM; IFE+/-: weak diffuse bands; IFE+: weak narrow band; BJP+/-: low concentrations of urine FLCs; ND not detected; *trephine biopsy +ve for MM.

9.2. Diagnosis of nonsecretory multiple myeloma

Figure 9.1 Serum FLC concentrations in patients with NSMM compared with normal individuals and patients with LCMM. • Clinical case No 3.
Figure 9.2 Serum IFE from 5 patients with κ NSMM and 3 patients with κ LCMM. Samples were applied at similar FLC concentrations.
Figure 9.3 Size-separation gel chromatography showing the FLC size variation in a serum sample from a patient with NSMM. The sample contained 1,754 mg/L of κ FLCs by immunoassay but was negative by SPE and IFE (Figure 9.2).

The above arguments suggest that sensitive assays for sFLCs might detect monoclonal proteins in a proportion of patients with NSMM. The results from a large study are shown in Table 9.1 [1].

Archived sera were obtained from patients studied in the UK, MRC multiple myeloma trials between 1983 and 1999. Out of 2,323 patients, 64 (2.8%) were diagnosed with NSMM and of these, 28 were selected for study because they had complete clinical records and the appropriate stored serum samples. In all patients, serum concentrations of κ and λ were compared with results from SPE and IFE tests.

The results showed that 19 of the 28 sera had elevated κ or λ sFLC concentrations and abnormal κ/λ ratios. A further 4 samples showed abnormally low levels of one or both FLCs. sFLC concentrations in the remaining 5 samples were substantially normal (Figure 9.1).

Careful repeat testing of the sera by IFE, using optimal sensitivity (Table 9.1), showed monoclonal sFLCs in 6 of the 28 sera but the monoclonal bands were mostly weak and diffuse. Rather surprisingly, in 9 of the 28 patients no monoclonal bands were seen using IFE even though the immunoassays indicated sFLC concentrations of >200mg/L, and some were considerably higher. In many of these samples, the elevated FLC concentrations should have been easily detectable by IFE.

IFE gels applied with sera from 5 of the samples containing high concentrations of κ FLCs are shown in Figure 9.2. These are compared with 3 κ samples from patients with typical LCMM. The sFLCs in the NSMM samples failed to focus into the same narrow monoclonal bands seen in the LCMM sera.

Two sera from nonsecretory patients with substantial concentrations of sFLCs (980mg/L and 1,700mg/L), were subjected to size-separation gel chromatography and found to contain highly polymerised FLCs (40-200kDa) (Figure 9.3). This suggested that variable polymerisation caused the monoclonal bands to smear on the SPE gels (see polymerisation in Chapter 4) and this could account for their absence or diffuse appearance. Such large polymers would have minimal renal clearance compared with monomeric FLCs. Good renal function would be maintained (typical of these patients) and little FLC would enter the urine. These observations concur with other reports that describe polymerised or structurally abnormal FLCs in some patients with MM [9][10][11].

Of additional interest, it was found that diffuse bands were more common in κ producing patients (Table 9.1). Hence, λ patients with low FLC production are more likely to produce discrete monoclonal bands and be classified as “secretory” LCMM. At one time, this dearth of λ patients led to the suggestion that such patients may not exist. Moreover, the observed higher frequency of κ polymerisation probably explains the 4:1 ratio of κ to λ NSMM patients reported in the literature [2].

There have been no other large studies on sFLC measurements in NSMM but there have been reports confirming the above observations in smaller groups of patients. Katzmann et al.[7], reported sFLCs in 5 patients with NSMM at diagnosis and all were abnormal. Six others had received high dose therapy and were in clinical remission, a finding supported by the FLC results. Similarly, van Rhee et al. [8] reported 4 of 5 NSMM patients with abnormal FLC concentrations. The advent of the sFLC immunoassays has made true NSMM even rarer than previously observed, perhaps only 1 in 200 myeloma patients [12][13]. sFLC testing should improve clinical outcome [14].

9.3. Monitoring nonsecretory multiple myeloma

Figure 9.4 Changes in serum FLCs and clinical status in 6 patients with NSMM. (Numbers refer to patients in Table 9.1).

Serum FLC concentrations are also important for monitoring disease progress. In an initial study, samples from 6 patients showed elevated sFLC levels at clinical presentation, reduced levels during plateau phase, and increased levels at relapse (Figure 9.4). One of the patients showed a discordance between clinical features and sFLC concentrations (No.2). While the patient was in remission from a clinical viewpoint, rising concentrations of FLCs indicated imminent disease relapse.

Many patients with NSMM have been studied prospectively since the assays first became available. Two examples are described below.

Clinical case history No 3

Clinical case history No 3. Nonsecretory multiple myeloma with “difficult to assess” symptoms during during clinical relapse

A 38-year-old woman, presented with a fractured rib following mild trauma. Over the following months, the pain subsided but non-specific symptoms including breathlessness, vague chest pains and tiredness persisted. During this time, full blood counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and biochemistry were all normal as were chest X-rays and lung function tests. In the absence of a diagnosis, the general practitioner considered a psychiatric assessment.

Seven months after the initial presentation, she remained symptomatic and was reinvestigated, whereupon bone scans and X-rays showed extensive osseous lesions. Immunoglobulin measurements showed immune paresis, but no serum monoclonal protein was detected. She was noted to have hypercalcaemia (2.85 mmol/L - NR: 2.08- 2.67) but had normal renal function. In view of the absence of monoclonal immunoglobulins, MM was still considered unlikely. However, a skull X-ray and CT scan showed osteolytic lesions (Figure 9.5) so a skull biopsy was performed which was reported as ‘plasmacytoma/NSMM’. She was given chemotherapy comprising ABCM for the following 8 months that resulted in clinical remission.

Seven months later and over 2 years after the initial presentation, she re-attended hospital because of chest pains and breathlessness. Again, clinical examination was normal, as were routine biochemistry and haematology tests. Immunology tests showed reduced immunoglobulins but no monoclonal spike. A bone marrow biopsy showed 5% plasma cells that were morphologically normal. Chest X-ray, a ventilation perfusion scan and lung function tests revealed no evidence of pulmonary disease. Blood tests were requested for FLCs, the results of which were: κ 330mg/L, λ 6.5mg/L and κ/λ ratio 51, suggesting recurrence of NSMM (Figure 9.1 and Figure 9.6 at week 67). Doubt was expressed regarding the validity of the results so FLC measurements were repeated 2 and 3 weeks later and showed κ increases to 470mg/L and then 525mg/L with a rising κ/λ ratio, confirming recurrence of the disease.

FLC concentrations were assessed retrospectively from archived samples and then the patient was monitored prospectively. Figure 9.6 shows that the κ FLC concentrations had increased rapidly during the tumour recurrence, with an apparent doubling time of 30 days as indicated by the κ/λ ratio. Serum κ concentrations subsequently reduced during VAD chemotherapy prior to high dose melphalan and PBSC rescue. During the period of relapse, the alternate FLC increased in concentration suggesting deteriorating renal clearance of FLCs from impaired glomerular filtration. Serum κ and λ concentrations and the κ/λ ratio returned towards normal, post-transplant, as the patient went into clinical remission. For 2 years following the transplant the patient remained completely well.

Discussion: NSMM is rare so it is not normally considered when a patient first presents with symptoms but rather when other diseases have been excluded. Even then, normal serum and urine tests for monoclonal proteins tend to deceive the diagnostician. When MM is finally thought of, the patient is subjected to a painful bone marrow biopsy, which is not undertaken lightly. Clearly, since sFLC measurements are important they should be requested when the diagnosis of MM is first considered.

While monitoring these patients, repeated serum tests should generally replace other forms of investigation. At present, skeletal surveys using X-rays, MRI or positron emission tomography may be used, together with repeated bone marrow biopsies. None of these tests is likely to provide results that are as representative of the changing total tumour burden as sFLC tests. sFLC concentrations assess FLC production from all of the bone marrow and extramedullary sites. They are likely to be a better reflection of overall tumour activity than bone marrow aspirations or skeletal surveys.

Of additional interest in these patients is the κ/λ ratio. This is a more accurate measure of changing monoclonal FLC production than individual FLC concentrations since the alternate FLC compensates for alterations in glomerular filtration rate. This was apparent during the relapse phase in this patient. After week 40, the alternate FLC gradually increased which suggested impaired renal function from renal deposition of tumour-produced FLCs.

It is also of note that normalisation of the κ/λ ratio had not occurred even 2 years after treatment. This suggests either that the clone of tumour cells persists or that bone marrow function has not completely returned to normal. It is likely that the patient has residual disease (Chapter 12).

Figure 9.5 X-ray and CT scans of the skull in nonsecretory multiple myeloma.

Figure 9.6 Serum FLC concentrations in Patient No 3 during the course of the disease. The changing κ/λ ratio is related to the tumour growth.

Clinical case history No 4

Clinical case history No 4. A patient with NSMM/plasmacytoma excluded from clinical trials.

A 37-year-old man with pelvic pain was found to have a solitary plasmacytoma located in the right iliac crest. Bone marrow biopsy of the opposite iliac crest was normal and no monoclonal protein was identified in serum or urine. Treatment comprised surgical resection followed by irradiation (5,000Gy). Subsequently, he remained asymptomatic, but 5 years later a routine skeletal survey showed a thoracic spine lesion at T-2 that was irradiated. Over the following 7 years further painful lesions developed. These were identified using different scanning techniques (particularly PET) and were treated with irradiation or melphalan and prednisolone.

Throughout this period, and in spite of repeated testing, no monoclonal protein was identified by SPE and UPE. Finally, 12 years after the initial presentation FLC immunoassays became available and showed; κ 7.5mg/L, λ 632mg/L and a κ/λ ratio 0.01. These results identified a λ producing tumour with no associated suppression of the κ FLC (Figure 9.7). One month later, λ concentrations had increased to 700mg/L, prompting treatment with thalidomide (50mg/day) and dexamethasone (40mg weekly). Over the subsequent 7 months, serum λ gradually fell to 33mg/L and the κ/λ ratio began to normalise. Based on the FLC results, dexamethasone was reduced to 12 mg per week and he remained well and in complete remission.

Figure 9.7 shows the changes in sFLC concentrations over a 12 month period. The effectiveness of the drugs and the doses required can all be monitored during this period of therapy. This has produced clear benefits for the patient and avoided costly scans and painful bone marrow biopsies. Furthermore, the patient can be entered into clinical trials of new treatments when absence of a disease marker had previously led to his exclusion. The patient has been monitored successfully using sFLC assays for many years since the original tests were performed.

Figure 9.7 Serum FLC concentrations in Patient No. 4 during treatment.

Test Questions
  1. Which is more sensitive, serum or urine IFE, for detecting NSMM?
  2. Why do most so called “NSMM” patients have excess monoclonal FLCs rather than excess monoclonal intact immunoglobulins?
  3. Are sFLC tests more accurate than bone marrow assessments of tumour responses?


Chapter 8 Back to Contents Page Chapter 10

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Drayson M, Tang LX, Drew R, Mead GP, Carr-Smith H, Bradwell AR. Serum free light-chain measurements for identifying and monitoring patients with nonsecretory multiple myeloma. Blood 2001; 97: 2900 – 2 PMID: 11313287
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Blade J, Kyle RA. Nonsecretory myeloma, immunoglobulin D myeloma and plasma cell leukemia. Hematol/Oncology Clinics of North America 1999; 13: 1259 – 72 PMID: 10626149
  3. Dreicer R, Alexanian R. Nonsecretory multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 1982; 13: 313 – 8 PMID: 7158626
  4. Sheehan T, Sinclair D, Tansey P, O'Donnell JR. Demonstration of serum monoclonal immunoglobulin in a case of non-secretory myeloma by immunoisoelectric focusing. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 806 – 9 PMID: 3926829
  5. Raubenheimer EJ, Dauth J, Senekal JC. Non-secretory IgA kappa myeloma with distended endoplasmic reticulum: a case report. Histopathology 1991; 19: 380 – 2 PMID: 1937418
  6. Reilly BM, Clarke P, Nikolinakos P. Clinical problem-solving. Easy to see but hard to find. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 59 – 64 PMID: 12510044
  7. 7.0 7.1 Katzmann JA, Abraham RS, Dispenzieri A, Lust JA, Kyle RA. Diagnostic performance of quantitative kappa and lambda free light chain assays in clinical practice. Clin Chem 2005; 51: 878 – 81 PMID: 15774572
  8. 8.0 8.1 van Rhee F, Bolejack V, Hollmig K, Pineda-Roman M, Anaissie E, Epstein J, et al. High serum-free light chain levels and their rapid reduction in response to therapy define an aggressive multiple myeloma subtype with poor prognosis. Blood 2007; 110: 827 – 32 PMID: 17416735
  9. Abdalla IA, Tabbara IA. Nonsecretory multiple myeloma. South Med J 2002; 95: 761 – 4 PMID: 12144086
  10. Coriu D, Weaver K, Schell M, Eulitz M, Murphy CL, Weiss DT, Solomon A. A molecular basis for nonsecretory myeloma. Blood 2004; 104: 829 – 31 PMID: 15090444
  11. Émond JP, Harding S, Lemieux B. Aggregation of serum free light chains (FLC) causes overestimation of FLC nephelometric results as compared to serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) while preserving clinical usefulness. Blood 2007; 110: 4767a
  12. Shaw GR. Nonsecretory plasma cell myeloma--becoming even more rare with serum free light-chain assay: a brief review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130: 1212-5 PMID: 16879026
  13. Rutherford C, Wians FH. A large skull mass in a 67 year-old woman. Lab Med 2006; 37: 417 - 21.
  14. Kumar S, Pérez WS, Zhang MJ, Bredeson CN, Lacy MQ, Milone G, et al. Comparable outcomes in secretory (SM) versus non-secretory (NSM) multiple myeloma (MM) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AuHCT). Blood 2007; 110: 944a
Personal tools